An interesting follow-up on an article earlier this week by the New York Observer, which looked at how the New York Times’ home page ‘gets made’.
In the piece, the Times’ digital news editor Jim Roberts said the site’s editors do not rely upon web traffic stats to decide what goes on the homepage.
Silicon Alley Insider disputes this – reporters don’t necessarily need to be aware of the traffic their stories get, it says, but web editors must pay attention to the clicks:
- “It’s the main way readers can show what kinds of stories they care about.
- “The New York Times is a deeply-in-debt, for-profit enterprise that needs to grow its traffic online in order to survive. Web editors should not pretend that it doesn’t matter how many ad impressions the Times serves each day.”
What’s the right balance?Similar Posts:
- Bits Blog: Traffic patterns visualised at the New York Times
- Reasons to be cheerful? Seattle paper, Roanoke Times and magazine publishers turning a profit
- FT.com: ProPublica and the realities of non-profit news
- Nieman Journalism Lab: HuffPo’s A/B headline testing
- Peston to tackle audience questions in TV debate